Digital Projector Was Invented In

Nietzsche: Nihilism & Psychology


Class Sto given in the library. Sunday in Barcelona on January 24, 2011. It says Heidegger's analysis of Nietzsche's thought. An analysis that involves an original conception of "truth" as the creation of a binding for the community, such as introduction of new values \u200b\u200b(ie, a reordering of the entire body). To listen to the class

just

sting here

Cat Hair Thread Count

The "dissolution" of psychology



In his interesting article on the psychology over S. XX, included in "The philosophical and scientific legacy s. XX "(ed. by Manuel Garrido, Luis M. Valdes and Luis Arenas, ed. Cátedra, pp. 821-840), referring to the last decades of the twentieth century, Julio Seoane refers to" the strong impression that never psychology was so lacking in theoretical or rigorous knowledge, along with the belief that either never had much success and social penetration in all types of public and private institutions of social life "(p.840)

Psychology is breaking in a number of fuzzy techniques to solve" problems "specific, a fragmentation that Seoane writes," gives priority to urgent social problems facing developments systematic, and this makes it appear a multitude of disciplines and specializations with new names and vague grounds, such as political psychology, psycho-oncology, psychology of addiction, the psychology of road safety, the psychology of the family or gender psychology, a few examples of an endless series. This produces a strong scattering of studies inbreeding of researchers and a general neglect of the original sources of psychology. The fragmentation is accompanied by an excessive multiplication of journals, publications, associations .... often useless consumption of institutional, human and economic, and consequent deterioration of intellectual quality "(p. 837)

What does this lack of theoretical foundation, and what is even more problematic, indifference by of psychologists to any attempt to substantiate, and the deterioration of intellectual quality? Possibly
death of psychology, "or at least its dissolution as a unique science, combined with other disciplines as neurophysiology, linguistics and other "or perhaps" its final configuration as a patchwork of ideas together with the purpose of consumption in a mass culture "(p.840)

Cornflour Is Good Or Bad To Health

Modernity and the loss of gods Reflections from


In "The time of the image in the world" (1938) Heidegger, among other things, wrote:

"A fifth of the modern phenomenon is the de-divinization or loss of gods. This term refers not only to a mere aside to the gods, ie the grossest atheism. For gods loss means the Double process by which, on one hand, and from the moment you put the foundation of the world in the infinite, unconditional, absolute, the image of the Christianized world, and on the other hand, Christianity transforms your Christianity in a world view (the Christian worldview), adapted in this way to modern times. The loss of gods is the state of indecision about God or gods. It is precisely the most part Christianity has played in this event. But, far from excluding religiosity gods loss is responsible for the relationship with the gods becomes a religious experience. When this happens is that the gods have fled. The vacuum result is filled through the historical and psychological analysis of myth.

What conception of beings and what interpretation of the truth behind these phenomena?
will restrict the question to the first mentioned phenomenon, ie science.
What is the essence of modern science?
What conception of beings and truth based on this essence? If we achieve the metaphysical foundation underpinning science as modern science, it is also possible to identify from it the essence of the modern era in general. Today, when we use the word 'science' it means something so essentially different doctrine and scientia of the Middle Ages and the Greek episteme. Greek science was never accurate, because in his heart it was impossible for him outside and did not need to be. So, is completely wrong to say that modern science is more accurate than that of antiquity. Similarly, no one can say that Galileo's theory on free falling bodies is true and that of Aristotle, who said that light bodies aspire to rise, is false, because the Greek conception of the essence of bodies, place, and the relationship between the two, is based on a different interpretation of the entity and therefore determines otherwise than to see and question of natural phenomena. A No one would claim that the literature of Shakespeare is an improvement over that of Aeschylus, but it is still more impossible to say that the modern conception of beings is more correct than the Greek. So if we want to capture the essence of modern science, we must first get rid of the habit of distinguishing modern science against the former only a matter of degree from the perspective of progress.

The essence of what we today call science is research. What is the essence of the research?
It is that self-knowledge, as appropriate to advance, is installed in a field of beings, in nature or history. Here, expedited process means not only the method, procedure, because all required and appropriate to advance an open area in which to move. But just to open up this sector is the fundamental step of research. Occurs when a field of beings, for example, in nature, is projected fundamental trait of natural phenomena. The project will mark the way in which the expedited process of knowledge must be linked to the open sector. This linkage is the rigor of the research. Through the projection of the fundamental feature of rigor and determination, an expedited process ensuring its sector of objects within the realm of being. To clarify this soon cast a glance at the oldest and also more rules of modern science, mathematical physics. To the extent that the current atomic physics also remains a physical one, the essence of what we say here (which is all that matters) can also be applied to it. "

To read the entire article just

sting here

Is Sleepy Time Tea Safe For Infants

combining items # 1: Camisa Negra

Hello Bloggers! My Youtube channel is taking a turn and is increasingly geared towards fashion, so if you had not been signed because he was not interested in makeup, and can return to click that nice little yellow button, because fashion is treading strong and gaining much ground. I decided to relate
much more my channel Dragonflysquare , because I have no time or ideas, to update both the blog, so it is likely that most of the entries are to video, but hey, that's not so bad , right? Best video that some pictures, tell me what you think.

said that there goes the video.



This is the first in a series of videos I remove an item and will bring ideas to combine them. Be a series of simple videos, but I think very useful.
If someone wants to teach a garment in particular just have to say, I'll be delighted.

What do you think about tickets to video? Do you like, do not prefer that? Comments please!

Advancement of entry: The next will be a small secret.

If you want to be the parrot of what's going on in my head all week do not hesitate to follow me in twitter: http://twitter.com/ # / claustweets

Pokemon Silver Pikachu Location

given in the Library Class Sto. Domingo, Barcelona, \u200b\u200bon Monday, January 10, 2011. itching can be heard here.

How To Solve Stomach Bloatedness

Nietzsche and Science Psychology and historiography

By Enrique Eskenazi.

Fragment of a given class on October 7, 2009.

Transcript Alejandro Bica .

Negativity means W. Giegerich the opposite of positivity or positivity or "positive" (= made empirical, verifiable, certifiable real out-there-ie out-of-world-purely-logical fact that one can refer to statements "ontic" or I can point to the index: this house, this feeling, this, this person, this neuron, this set of neurons, this family, etc. etc. The psychic-this feeling, this emotion, this reaction, etc .- is so "outside" of logic and is as "positive" as the physical.) The "positive" is what exists as an entity and therefore perceive and / or subjected to scientific experimentation. It thus has positive character "Substantial." The downside is just that there is no such entity or as a substance (but no less real) and therefore can not be directly verifiable, tested in laboratory or pointing with the index of common sense like a thing particular or specific set of things).

Giegerich writes: "With respect to positive and negative, perhaps the following idea to put people on the right track. In contrast to the living or the bodies, ie , plants, animals, people, who have a positive existence, "life" has no positive existence, it is not an entity, not a thing. It can not see or touch or prove. Exists only in living things, but not identical with them, because these beings can die, that is, losing his life. It is (obviously) all-negative, absolutely not, because there is simply nothing (rather, is a powerful reality, just not "positive"). We must be careful not to "positivized" which is obviously negative " .

The good deals only with matters of fact and experience (experimentation) rather than the speculative and theoretical. Acts and experiments can be explored by the positive sciences.

This is what would differentiate Giegerich psychology of any science. For Giegerich, and to CG Jung at times of his work, psychology will never be a science, but science is sublethal, is what puts into question all the sciences, but can not be a science among sciences , but below is the view that questions the science itself. Jung saw this at times, but otherwise wanted to be a scientist, an empiricist. For Giegerich psychology or even pretend to be a science, because all the sciences are moving in the positive terrain, science is always talking about facts that are there in front, but are made so subtle as quantum particles, which are always facts, facts reducible to laboratory experiments.

The moment that psychology is "living spirit", a logical process that is expressed through a culture will never be an object that is there in front and can be verified empirically. For Giegerich this is not a limitation, it is an honor. Psychology therefore contain a science, but transferred to a level at which science can not, nor want, nor should it come, because science has never imported the truth. In science the only thing I control is imported, the results, the domain, accuracy, measurability, but never the truth. Maybe in the beginning of science in the eighteenth century, science still confused with the spirit of truth, but at the level where we are today, and has already revealed the history of science where science leads technology and service is necessary for technological and commercial interests and no longer appears as the selfless spirit of seeking truth.

In this M. Heidegger criticized his science, "which is contained in Giegerich, saying that" science does not think "the calculated science, but calculating is not thinking "dialectically," is not into things, but that is break it down into quantities that allow to control them, measure them and dispose of them. Not bad. Is a property company of the Western spirit, but it has nothing to do with the desire for truth, but it has to do with the desire for control, predictability, domination (being a form of what Nietzsche call "will power").

Science is positive. Giegerich psychology to never will be. And a call purporting to be positive psychology, to Giegerich, no logos, no thought, only estimated. Most of the therapies offered today, such as psychology do not want to think, want to dominate, to remove the symptom, make you feel better, sell, persuade, but not interested in truth. Indeed, many even give up the theory, which is the contemplation of truth. Of course, to renounce the theory does not mean that there is an implicit theory. Is there but not seen. They are not interested in it because they want results. It's like the technology, they want control, they want control, and that is fine, but do not have logos not think, do not think explicitly not rise to the level of questioning and making explicit the principles of understanding and awareness is at stake there.

Cervix Before 3days Period

Happy Epiphany !

Hello Bloggers! I hope that these three big boy camel have been good:) will edit later with what I have left me.
In this post I'm posting a video on my YouTube channel, if you still do not know do not know what you expect, click here .

I teach two sets designed for a concert, but suitable for day to day.

I have twitter! Follow me! Http://twitter.com/claustweets

And here's my gift! They've been, yes:)

Comentemoslo a bit:

The small memory card this is not really, but an 8GB, which appears in the photograph is old, and now I have much capacity to record videos muahahah! (Evil laugh) That

Albal paper silver packet comes from the grandparents' house ... hmm ... I think we all know what it is, right?

hair products require a somewhat more elaborate explanation: I already knew the fact the producer of silicones in hair, but I never had to leave them conscious, I do not seem so important. But I've developed an addiction to videos this girl, her nick is 87romper and a few videos very interesting and elaborate, mostly related to fashion, so I recommend that they take a look. The fact is that you also have videos dedicated to hair care and they touch the issue of silicone, so I also decided to leave the dark side and go over to natural products. I could go on talking about it, but I think there are enough forums, blogs, videos, etc, talking about it on the internet. I forgot, the shampoo is to Yes to tomatoes that are sold at sephora , and conditioner is the Coolaulin Lush of scented coconut confess my obsession in coconut.

And after this massive roll, CHAN CHAN CHAN! Best of the Best! The interior fleece boots! Military boots love, is my other obsession and recently spent a lot of cold feet, so I asked around with sheep inside to keep our feet warm during the winter, the only bad thing is that the sheep only in the tongue and around hahaha but no matter, they are still beautiful! In Mustang.

Play Sims 2 Mansion And Garden Stuff Without Disc

The issue of history has been a constant among the subjects of this blog, either approach the "cycle time" in the treaty gnosis Henry Corbin , whether Marxist approach history as conducting material imagination , treated by Loren Goldner , through the insights of Nietzsche on "utility or desirability of history for life" or the "Theses on the Philosophy of History" of Walter Benjamin .

is not a concern for "the past events ", let alone by the" recording of past events, in truth, not about "facts" but an understanding of "that which speaks" in history. In contrast to the story as "science factual record" and the kind of consciousness that justifies it, may well be called "historiography." But as Heidegger wrote and in the late 30's:

historiography is linked to past events, seen in each case of this form or another historical meditation, however, is linked to that happen on the basis of which can only become and be the facts. Meditation is historical subject to a higher law and more rigorous historiography, although it may seem that the reverse occurs.

This paragraph is taken from its course fundamental questions of philosophy. "Problems" select "logic" Xolocoatzi translated by Angel Yanes, for ed. Comares, Granada, 2008 (p. 48 et seq.), Of which I've posted a clip on the website of the Centre, under the name of consideration historical and historiographical Meditation . There, among other things, can be read (emphasis added) :

historiographical consideration is essential only in so far as it is carried by a historical meditation, directed by it in the approaches of the questions and determined by it in the delimitation of its tasks. But conversely it also states that consideration and historiographical knowledge are essential. This is much more to an era that has to free itself from the shackles of historiography and its confusion with history. This release is necessary because a creative era should be protected against both an imitation, often unscientific and weak past , as against irreverent abuse of what has been , two seemingly opposing attitudes on a mutual, which are merged very easily, but that in itself are completely entangled.

is well known that the natural sciences support the historiographical account of his own past as merely an addition, since in general the past for them is only what is already is not. Natural science itself always considered this nature only ( gegenwärtigen ). Based on this attitude long ago a famous mathematician said, being a discussion of the occupation of a chair of classical philology, that chair should be replaced by a chair natural sciences, with the following argument: that of dealing with classical philology is already "past." By contrast, natural sciences consider not only the real this , but they can even predict, calculate in advance how it should be real and thus can support the technique. Conversely, the historiography of the natural science discoveries and theories are past, which have been long surpassed by progress. The "history" of science, from the standpoint of historiography, is to science what natural science is constantly leaves behind in its progress toward ever new results. The historiography of the natural science does not belong to her or his conduct. By considering the sequence historiographical doctrines and past discoveries one can at most beautifully clear how far it has come and how far have been delayed past, which still dominate the "philosophy" and "speculation" with unsustainable dreams, which now finally been broken by the accurate and sober account of the "facts." Thus, historiographical consideration may find that a philosopher like Aristotle was of the opinion that heavy bodies fall faster than light, while the "facts" of modern science have noted that all bodies fall at the same speed. Historiographical consideration of this type is therefore a compensation increase of progress, where new in each case is seen as more progressive.

However, beyond the historiographical account is still possible, as we say, historical meditation and some day will be even essential. Ask for historical meditation fundamental experience and the fundamental concept that had the Greeks in general, and especially Aristotle, "nature" of the body, movement, place and time. Historical meditation will recognize that the fundamental experience Aristotle and Greek nature was so kind that the rate of fall of heavy bodies and light and the appropriate place could not be seen or determined at all differently from how they were determined. A historical meditation will recognize that the Greek doctrine of natural processes is not based on insufficient observation, but other conception of nature -perhaps even deeper, which precedes all unique observations. For Aristotle "physical" means precisely the metaphysics of nature.

A historical meditation also recognize that just modern natural science is based on a metaphysics so so unconditional, so strong and so obvious that most scientists do not suspect anything about it. A historical meditation on the fundamentals of natural science modern aided recognize that the very fact that modern experimental science is asserted as the only real, can only be viewed as facts and substantiated in the light of a metaphysics of the very specific nature, a metaphysics that is not less work for the fact that today's scientists do not know nothing of it. On the contrary, the great scientists, who based the modern natural science, have been and remain great precisely because they had the strength and passion, but also education for the fundamental thinking.

A historical meditation recognize that it makes no sense at all to measure the Aristotelian doctrine of motion simply on the results of the doctrine of Galileo and judge the first and last as delayed and progressive, because in both cases "nature" means something completely different . According to the calculation of historiography, modern natural science is certainly more progressive than the Greek, if the technical mastery and with it the destruction of nature is progress, as opposed to the custody of nature as a metaphysical power. However, this progressive modern natural science, thought from the standpoint of historical meditation, is not one iota more real than the Greek, however, at most, more untrue , because it is fully enmeshed in his scheme of many discoveries methodical and let out what is the proper object of these discoveries: the nature, the human reference to it and its position therein.

compensation Comparison and historiography of the past and present lead to the result of the escalation of the actual. Historical meditation on what the future was and intellection leads to the lack of ground reference or current lack of reference to nature, to the insight that the natural sciences in general all the sciences are, despite their progress, or perhaps precisely because of the progress-in a crisis. Indeed, as it sounds now, should "shut up finally today the talk about the crisis of science" (speech of registration of the current president, beginning December 1937). However, the "crisis" of science is not so far not been represented in "chairs" of paleontology, ethnology, ethnography, and others, nor is she yet was not sufficiently "close to life itself-that it is too much. However, you can stop talking about these things as "crisis" of science. Because deep crisis these makers are fully in line with current science and indulge in it, may even be their best advocates, as soon have their respective positions. But the "crisis" of course is another and not from 1933 or even 1918, blamed the nineteenth century, but the beginning of modernity, what was not a mistake, but a destination and a destination only be surpassed by .

The most acute crisis of contemporary science could be that she does not suspect at all how the crisis is involved, that she believes to be already sufficiently confirmed by his success and tangible results. But everything spiritual and everything that wants to dominate as spiritual power, and would have to be more than just a hustle, and never can be confirmed by the success and usefulness . historical meditation into question the present and future of science itself and destroys his faith in progress, since that meditation does know that in essentials no progress, but only the transformation of the same . Historiographical consideration is for the natural sciences and all knowledge perhaps only one external addition does take knowledge of his own past as passed. By contrast, historical meditation belongs to the essence of all science, insofar as it intends to prepare and train beyond the useful results, a knowledge essential for their field and the field of being.

still science and current institution completely synthesizes only bureaucratically, "the university are very far from presenting some of the be-needed historical meditation. Why? Because this difference, presumably only the abstract, between the consideration historiography and historical meditation is not experienced or apprehended, and when not to be apprehended at all. Well, we are accustomed long to the fact that a scientist in his field may refer to achievements recognized at the same time may be blind, with a shocking ignorance, against everything that gives the science foundation and legitimacy. We even found it "wonderful." We have long slipped in the most desolate Americanism, the principle is that it is true what is successful and everything else is "speculation" that is "distant dreams of life."

Optimism is a good thing, but only the repression of pessimism, and pessimism and his opponent grow only on the site of a conception of reality and thus of history in the sense of a business whose prospects are calculated either as hopeful, sometimes as the opposite. There is only optimism and pessimism in considering the history of historiography. Optimists are people who can not get rid of pessimism, because "why else would they have to be optimistic? On the contrary, historical meditation is out of this opposition between optimism and pessimism, because it does have the joy of achievement and not with the horror of a stay of progress or even return, but the historical meditation works on the preparation of a Dasein (exist) historical is the height of their destiny, of the top moments of being.

This information should imply that the difference between the consideration historiography and historical meditation is not a construction of thought, a construction "speculative" and flying freely, but being-requires more hard of a decision , whose acceptance or neglect is critical about ourselves and about our determination to history.

In this bold and controversial comments, Heidegger and proposed the problem of " truth " when he says, for example, that the progressive and progressors modern science of nature "is not one iota more real" than the Greek. Grave mistake would interpret this statement as postulating the falseness of modern science against the "truth" of Greek science. This is fallacious, as Heidegger points here at the very historicity of "the truth"-which in no way implies a giving up the truth, but rather the need for historical appropriation (not historiography) that truth and that destination , which is so true.

can read the entire article itching here .